Nursing homes around the country are now requiring prospective residents to agree to binding arbitration before admittance into a home. By signing an agreement to arbitrate, nursing home residents are forever giving up any rights to seek compensation in a court of law for harm caused by caregivers who abuse or neglect a resident, or for any other nursing home malpractice. Those claims would be handled by an arbitrator, usually a retired judge or an experienced (but often jaded) lawyer.
These arbitration clauses have profound implications, and should be avoided when possible. As this Wall Street Journal article points out, they are a part of a nursing-home-industry strategy to use arbitration agreements to reduce litigation costs, take cases away from juries, and lower compensation awards.
Apparently it has worked. According to a nursing home industry study, average costs to settle cases have begun decreasing as claims of poor treatment are increasing. Nursing homes have learned over the years that neglect or abuse of a vulnerable senior citizen is an emotionally charged thing. And when juries get emotionally charged, they tend to take action to right the wrong that has been committed – usually in the form of verdict commensurate with the wrongdoing – exactly as the U.S. Constitution intended.
California Nursing Home Abuse Lawyer Blog








