DO YOU SUSPECT ABUSE OR NEGLECT? Contact Us for a Free Consultation

by

Washington D.C.’s most powerful lobbyists are being hired by the nursing home industry to fight congressional efforts to reform the industry. The industry is closely watching bipartisan legislation that would significantly increase oversight and enforcement of nursing homes around the country.

The new legislation, recently introduced by Sens. Grassley (R) and Kohl (D), would require nursing homes to fully disclose their ownership structures, and would increase penalties if a patient is injured or dies due to negligent or neglectful care. The industry is expected to pay millions to fight this legislation.

Why would nursing home owners disapprove so strongly of a law that requires them to disclose who actually owns and runs the facilities that provide them such a great profit? Liability. Many owners have created maze-like ownership structures that makes it nearly impossible to find out who actually owns the facility when something goes wrong. It’s not uncommon to have a one corporate entity own the building, who then leases it to a second company (the nursing home), who then contracts with a third company to operate it.

Continue reading

by

The California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform has issued its 2007 Nursing Home Citation Report. CANHR has prepared a citation summary, including the name of the nursing facility, the date, the level of citation, and a brief summary of the facts that led up to the citation. There is also an instructional key to help readers understand how the individual nursing home citations summaries are displayed. The report, which is broken down by California counties, can be found here. (.pdf)

In summary, a total of 651 citations were issued against nursing homes in California by the Department of Public Health in the year 2007, 22 of which were Class AA citations (violations caused a death), and 122 were Class A (violations present imminent danger and a substantial probability of death).

by

Every skilled nursing facility (nursing home) in California is licensed by the California Department of Public Health (DPH). DPH, in turn, is charged with the responsibility of monitoring nursing homes in the state, which includes conducting annual inspections and investigating complaints of abuse or neglect.

Most complaints involve allegations of abuse or neglect of the nursing home resident, but any topic can be the subject of a complaint, including, but not limited to, poor staffing, unsafe conditions, mistreatment, transfer and discharge concerns, generally poor care, or a violation of patient rights. Once a complaint is made – and any person may make a complaint – the DPH will create a file and assign an investigator to the case. In most cases, the investigation is concluded within 90 days. For a list of local DPH offices click here.

If you have a complaint, it is usually a good idea to first address those concerns to the nursing facility itself, whether it is the administrator or the family council. If dissatisfied with the response, it is suggested to call the local ombudsman in your county for further advice. If a complaint involves serious allegations of abuse or neglect that has resulted in some injury, it probably a good idea to get the advice of an attorney with experience in nursing home abuse or neglect cases, such as the attorneys at Walton Law Firm LLP.

Continue reading

by

A report from the Government Accountability Office states that widespread deficiencies addressing malnutrition, bedsores, medication errors, and abuse of nursing home residents are often understated.

Congressional investigators have confirmed in the report something advocates for the elderly have known for sometime. That is, nursing home inspectors routinely miss, overlook, or minimize problems in nursing facilities that can pose a serious risk to patient health.

In California, nursing homes are inspected once a year by the Department of Public Health, which sets the licensing standards. The GAO report found that state employees missed at least one serious deficiency in 15% of the inspections audited by the federal government.

Continue reading

by

A jury in Arizona has awarded $6 million to the family of Sylvia Culpepper after the 81 year old died from an overdose of morphine in a nursing home. Culpepper, who was an active senior, was in the ManorCare nursing home only to recover from a back injury, and was expected to return home after her recovery.

According to reports, the nursing home resident was diagnosed with sciatica in late 2003, and prescribed 15 milligrams of morphine, twice daily. Two days later, while still in the hospital, her morphine dosage was doubled. When she was discharged to Manor Care, both of the prescriptions went with her, and the nursing home staff immediately began giving Culpepper both dosages, twice daily, totally unaware of the mix up.

Attorneys representing the family said the jury blamed the nursing home for failing to recognize morphine intoxication and overdose, and for understaffing.

Continue reading

by

When entering a nursing home, residents or their family are usually presented with a stack of documents that address everything from the fees to be paid to the type of pillow the resident prefers. More than a dozen signatures can be required to complete the admissions process. Often buried within that stack is an arbitration provision, a binding contract wherein the resident agrees that any disputes over nursing home malpractice, negligence, neglect, or abuse will not be resolved in the courts, but via private arbitration. Private arbitration is simply a process where allegations of neglect or abuse are resolved by a private judge (frequently a lawyer) and not a jury.

Last week, the American Association of Justice, the United State’s largest trial bar, announced its support for legislation titled The Fairness in Nursing Home Arbitration Act, which allows the decision to arbitrate to be made after a dispute has arisen, not before in the admissions process.

According to the AAJ, the passage of this act will prevent corporate nursing home owners from manipulating the arbitration system in their favor and at the expense of nursing home residents.

Continue reading

by

In California, approximately 200,000 claims of elder abuse are investigated every year by California social services. Because of proposed cuts to the California state budget, the ability to investigate claims of neglect or abuse could be reduced dramatically at a time when a greater portion of our population will be considered “elderly.”

The director of the Center of Excellence in Elder Abuse and Neglect at UC Irvine is watching closely whether 75 social worker positions will be cut in the upcoming state budget. Mary Twomey stated that such a reduction in the investigation work force could translate into 20,000 allegations of elder abuse or neglect that will go uninvestigated.

by

Dehydration in the nursing home can lead to significant complications, including death. If the human body is deprived of necessary fluids, several symptoms may appear, including an increased heart rate, decreased sweating, decreased urination, extreme fatigue, headaches, cramps, and tingling of the limbs.

The causes of dehydration are several. The most common is vomiting, diarrhea, malnutrition, or the simple failure to replenish the body with the liquids that are lost from sweating and urinating. Sadly, this is the most common cause of the dehydration in the nursing home.

Nursing homes have a legal duty to provide adequate hydration to their residents, and to provide the proper training to their employees to recognize the signs and symptoms of dehydration. The aging process itself will often cause a decrease in appetite, but this is never an excuse for dehydration in a patient (even though it’s an excuse frequently used by nursing homes). For patients at risk, nursing homes are required to monitor the food intake and urine output of its residents, and keep the medical doctor informed of the resident’s condition. The failure to do this may be a violation of the standard of care.

Continue reading

by

Living in a nursing home or assisted living facility continues to get more and more expensive. For a fifth consecutive year, the average annual cost for a private room in a nursing facility rose to $76,460. The costs varied dramatically state by state.

The costs for living in an assisted living facility also rose dramatically. Nationally, the average annual costs of living in an assisted living or residential care facility averaged $36,000, up 25% since 2004.

Experts believe that the costs of living in a nursing or residential facility will continue to rise if a shortage of long-term care workers is not resolved. As baby-boomers approach retirement, most have not adequately addressed the prospect of needing long-term nursing care in old age. The average person spends approximately 2.5 years in a nursing home, at a cost of over $190,000. Just a year or two in a nursing home can wipe out a persons lifetime of savings.

by

Police have arrested an Escondido couple for cheating elderly victims throughout San Diego County in a financial scam that garnered $1.5 million. According to police, Janet and Ronald Reiswig cheated 30 people in the county, most of them senior citizens. The Reiswigs have been charged with 79 criminal counts, including elder abuse and fraud.

According to reports, the couple advertised a certificate of deposit investment product that they claimed would return between 7 and 7.5%. In meetings at their offices, the Reiswigs persuaded their mostly elderly clients to write checks that they promised would be invested. They weren’t. Instead the victims were sent phony CDs from the Reiswig’s company Global Reserve BT, and the couple then used the money for their personal use.

One East County woman, who is 76, said Friday she lost $63,000 to the alleged investment scam. It was nearly everything she had saved, after a lifetime of setting aside $25, maybe $50, a month. Now, she said, she is reduced to living on her Social Security check, which is less than $1,000 a month, to cover gas, food and rent. Money is so tight, she said, that she quit going to church most days of the week because gas is too expensive.

Continue reading
Justia Lawyer Rating
Super Lawyers
BBB Rating A+
Avvo Rating 10.0
Elder Justice Advocates
Consumer Attorneys California
AV Preeminent badge
Contact Information
North County Office
950 Boardwalk
#304
San Marcos, CA 92078
Toll Free: 866.607.1325 Local: 760.571.5500 Fax: 760.571.5501
San Diego Office
2169 1st Ave
San Diego, CA 92101
Toll Free: 866.607.1325

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2025, Walton Law Firm
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design